Should you exclude certain demographics in Google Ads?
Yes—sometimes. But in most accounts I manage, demographic exclusions are a “scalpel,” not a “default setting.” Excluding demographics can improve efficiency when there’s clear, repeatable evidence a segment can’t convert profitably, or when the product genuinely cannot apply to that group. The tradeoff is that exclusions reduce reach, can slow learning (especially in automated bidding), and can accidentally remove high-intent users who are simply classified as “Unknown” or misclassified.
The best rule of thumb is this: start by measuring demographics and adjusting bids (or budgets/creative strategy), then move to exclusions only after you’ve proven the segment is consistently unqualified or consistently unprofitable at scale.
What “demographics” actually means (and why it matters)
In Google Ads, demographics commonly include age and gender, plus household income (available only in certain countries, including the United States) and parental status (available in some campaign types, but not universally). These signals are modeled and inferred; they’re not perfect, and not every user can be assigned confidently—so you’ll often see an “Unknown” category.
One important nuance: age and gender targeting tends to behave more strictly than household income and parental status. With income and parental status, you may still see delivery that doesn’t perfectly align with what you selected, which is another reason to treat exclusions cautiously.
When demographic exclusions are a good idea (and when they’re not)
Good reasons to exclude demographics
You have hard business constraints. If you’re selling a product that legally requires adulthood, or your service is explicitly designed for a narrow life stage, exclusions can prevent wasted spend and reduce irrelevant lead volume. (You should still confirm your compliance approach, because “adults only” is not the same as “exclude everyone except 18+” in every campaign type and scenario.)
You have enough conversion data to trust the pattern. If a demographic segment has meaningful volume and has been unprofitable across multiple time windows (not just a bad week), exclusions can be warranted. I like to see consistency over at least 30–90 days, and I want to confirm the pattern holds after controlling for device, location, and query intent.
You’re protecting lead quality, not chasing a cosmetic CPA. Sometimes a demographic segment “converts,” but produces low-quality leads, high refund rates, or low downstream revenue. Exclusions can be a smart move when you’re optimizing to real business outcomes (qualified calls, sales accepted leads, revenue), not just front-end form fills.
Common situations where exclusions backfire
When you exclude “Unknown.” “Unknown” often represents a large portion of traffic. Excluding it can quietly cut your reach and remove valuable prospects—especially on placements or sites that don’t support (or don’t pass) demographic targeting signals. Unless you have a very specific reason to narrow reach aggressively, keeping “Unknown” enabled is usually the right call.
When the account is still learning. In smaller accounts or new campaigns, demographic performance is noisy. Exclusions too early can lock you into a narrow pocket of demand and prevent the system from finding efficient conversions you didn’t anticipate.
When automation needs room to optimize. If you’re using automated bidding (especially conversion-based strategies), heavy demographic exclusions can reduce the volume needed for stable learning and can increase volatility. Often, the better approach is to keep broad eligibility and tighten intent using keywords, search terms, creatives, landing pages, and qualification steps.
A practical framework to decide what to exclude (step by step)
Step 1: Diagnose with the Demographics report (before touching targeting)
Before you exclude anything, pull demographic performance for a clean date range (at least 30 days; ideally 60–90 if volume allows). Then sanity-check whether you’re looking at enough conversions per segment to make a decision. If a segment only has a handful of conversions, your “CPA by age” story is usually just randomness.
Also check whether your conversion action is a true success event. If you optimize to a low-intent conversion (like “page view” or “time on site”), demographic optimization becomes misleading fast, because different groups browse differently.
Step 2: Fix measurement and lead-quality feedback loops first
If you can’t distinguish a qualified lead from an unqualified lead, demographic exclusions become guesswork. The most profitable accounts I’ve managed treat demographics as one of many signals—but the signal only becomes actionable when you can connect conversions to quality (offline imports, enhanced conversion setup where applicable, or at least a strong lead scoring/qualification process).
Step 3: Run controlled tests before permanent exclusions
When you suspect a segment is weak, testing is safer than immediately excluding. Depending on campaign type and bidding, that may look like reducing bid adjustments (where available) or splitting budget into a test campaign that applies demographic restrictions while the original stays open. Your goal is to confirm you’re improving incremental performance, not just shifting volume around.
Step 4: Apply exclusions only when you can answer “what happens to the money?”
The hidden risk with exclusions is not the exclusion—it’s the reallocation. If you exclude a segment, where will that spend go? Into stronger demographics? Into weaker placements? Into broader match variants? This is why exclusions should be paired with a clear plan to redirect spend toward proven intent signals (high-performing search themes, better-qualified audiences, stronger geos, or more specific landing pages).
Quick decision checklist (use this before excluding any demographic)
- Is the segment large enough that performance is statistically meaningful (not just a few clicks or a couple conversions)?
- Is the conversion action you’re optimizing to a true business outcome (or at least strongly correlated with it)?
- Does the segment remain weak across multiple time windows (not just a recent dip)?
- Have you checked whether “Unknown” is a major share of conversions/revenue?
- Do you have a clear plan for where the freed budget should go (and how you’ll verify it improved results)?
Policy and platform constraints you must consider (especially in the U.S.)
Housing, employment, and credit: demographic targeting restrictions
If you advertise in housing, employment, or credit-related categories in the United States (and certain other regions), you may not be allowed to use certain demographic targeting controls the way advertisers typically do. In these restricted categories, demographic targeting and bid adjustments can be limited or prohibited, and the platform may require you to keep demographic categories enabled rather than excluding them. If you operate in any of these verticals (or adjacent services that can be interpreted as such), treat demographic exclusions as a compliance risk until you confirm the exact restriction set for your ads and targeting configuration.
Minors and age targeting: what you can and can’t do
Users under 18 aren’t eligible for personalized advertising. This matters for two reasons. First, you generally shouldn’t build strategies that assume you can “target minors” using demographic selections. Second, if you think you’re seeing results from ages 14–17, what’s often happening in practice is that the traffic is being attributed to “Unknown” age rather than a confirmed under-18 bucket.
Separately, for signed-in child accounts managed under family supervision (under 13 or the applicable age in the country), advertisers can request an additional exclusion so ads don’t show to those recognized users across major networks. That’s not the same as demographic targeting; it’s an account-level exclusion request designed for child accounts.
The “Unknown” category is not “low quality”—it’s “not identified”
“Unknown” doesn’t mean “not your customer.” It means the platform can’t confidently infer the user’s age, gender, parental status, or household income. Many excellent customers sit in “Unknown,” and some inventory sources don’t support demographic signals at all. Excluding “Unknown” is one of the fastest ways to accidentally shrink scale and raise costs—so do it only when you’re intentionally narrowing reach and you’ve proven the tradeoff is worth it.
How I handle demographic exclusions in real accounts
Search campaigns: prioritize intent first, demographics second
On Search, query intent (keywords and search terms) usually dominates demographics. If performance is weak in a demographic segment, I first look for an intent mismatch: overly broad queries, poor landing page alignment, or a funnel that doesn’t qualify users well. Only after intent is tight do I consider demographic bid adjustments or exclusions—and even then, I avoid excluding “Unknown” unless the account is mature and the business is intentionally narrowing.
Display, video, and Demand Gen: demographics can help, but exclusions should be tested
In upper-funnel campaigns, demographic exclusions can change the entire audience composition quickly. That can be good when you’re aligning creative to a very specific buyer, but it can also strip away low-cost reach that later converts through remarketing or assisted paths. Here, I’m more likely to run parallel tests: one ad group/campaign open, one restricted, both measured against the same conversion definitions and (ideally) downstream quality metrics.
If you’re unsure, don’t exclude—segment and learn
If you’re on the fence, the safest “expert move” is to leave demographics enabled, keep “Unknown” included, and use reporting to learn where the best performance truly comes from. Then apply measured changes—small bid shifts, creative variants by audience, or budget splits—before you make permanent exclusions that you’ll later have to unwind.
Let AI handle
the Google Ads grunt work
| Question | Short answer | Key considerations | Recommended actions | Relevant Google Ads documentation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Should I exclude certain demographics from my targeting? | Sometimes, but exclusions should be used as a precise “scalpel,” not a default. Start by measuring and adjusting, then exclude only when a segment is clearly unqualified or unprofitable at scale. |
|
|
|
| When are demographic exclusions a good idea? | They make sense when there are clear legal or business constraints, or when a segment is consistently unprofitable or produces low-quality outcomes at meaningful scale. |
|
|
|
| When do demographic exclusions usually backfire? | They’re risky when you exclude “Unknown,” when campaigns are still in learning, or when automated bidding needs more data to optimize. |
|
|
|
| How should I decide what to exclude? | Use a step-by-step framework: diagnose with reports, fix measurement and lead-quality feedback, test changes, then exclude only when you know how budget will be reallocated. |
|
|
|
| What policy constraints apply to housing, employment, and credit? | In the United States and Canada, housing, employment, and consumer finance ads can’t use certain demographic targeting controls; many options must remain enabled. |
|
|
|
| How should I treat minors and age-based targeting? | Users under 18 aren’t eligible for personalized advertising, and you can’t deliberately target child accounts; however, you can request an account-level exclusion so your ads don’t show to recognized child accounts. |
|
|
|
| How should I handle the “Unknown” demographic category? | Treat “Unknown” as “not identified,” not as a low-quality segment; it often contains a large share of high-value users and some inventory that lacks demographic signals. |
|
|
|
| How should I handle demographic exclusions in Search campaigns? | Prioritize intent first and demographics second; search intent (keywords and queries) usually matters more for performance than demographic filters. |
|
|
|
| How should I handle demographic exclusions in Display, Video, and Demand Gen? | Demographics can significantly change who sees your ads, so test exclusions in controlled setups and track downstream impact, not just front-end metrics. |
|
|
|
| What should I do if I’m unsure about excluding a demographic? | Default to learning, not excluding: keep demographics (including “Unknown”) enabled, segment performance, then make small, testable adjustments before any permanent exclusions. |
|
|
Demographic exclusions in Google Ads can be useful in specific cases, but they’re best treated as a precise, data-driven adjustment rather than a default—especially because signals are imperfect and the “Unknown” category often contains valuable customers, and because heavy exclusions can reduce reach and slow automated bidding learning. If you want a clearer way to evaluate whether a segment is truly unqualified (or just underperforming due to intent, creative, or measurement), Blobr connects to your Google Ads account and continuously analyzes performance to surface practical, prioritized actions; its specialized AI agents can help you tighten intent first (for example by spotting wasted spend and proposing negative keywords) and then validate whether any demographic restrictions make sense based on consistent results and real business outcomes.
Should you exclude certain demographics in Google Ads?
Yes—sometimes. But in most accounts I manage, demographic exclusions are a “scalpel,” not a “default setting.” Excluding demographics can improve efficiency when there’s clear, repeatable evidence a segment can’t convert profitably, or when the product genuinely cannot apply to that group. The tradeoff is that exclusions reduce reach, can slow learning (especially in automated bidding), and can accidentally remove high-intent users who are simply classified as “Unknown” or misclassified.
The best rule of thumb is this: start by measuring demographics and adjusting bids (or budgets/creative strategy), then move to exclusions only after you’ve proven the segment is consistently unqualified or consistently unprofitable at scale.
What “demographics” actually means (and why it matters)
In Google Ads, demographics commonly include age and gender, plus household income (available only in certain countries, including the United States) and parental status (available in some campaign types, but not universally). These signals are modeled and inferred; they’re not perfect, and not every user can be assigned confidently—so you’ll often see an “Unknown” category.
One important nuance: age and gender targeting tends to behave more strictly than household income and parental status. With income and parental status, you may still see delivery that doesn’t perfectly align with what you selected, which is another reason to treat exclusions cautiously.
When demographic exclusions are a good idea (and when they’re not)
Good reasons to exclude demographics
You have hard business constraints. If you’re selling a product that legally requires adulthood, or your service is explicitly designed for a narrow life stage, exclusions can prevent wasted spend and reduce irrelevant lead volume. (You should still confirm your compliance approach, because “adults only” is not the same as “exclude everyone except 18+” in every campaign type and scenario.)
You have enough conversion data to trust the pattern. If a demographic segment has meaningful volume and has been unprofitable across multiple time windows (not just a bad week), exclusions can be warranted. I like to see consistency over at least 30–90 days, and I want to confirm the pattern holds after controlling for device, location, and query intent.
You’re protecting lead quality, not chasing a cosmetic CPA. Sometimes a demographic segment “converts,” but produces low-quality leads, high refund rates, or low downstream revenue. Exclusions can be a smart move when you’re optimizing to real business outcomes (qualified calls, sales accepted leads, revenue), not just front-end form fills.
Common situations where exclusions backfire
When you exclude “Unknown.” “Unknown” often represents a large portion of traffic. Excluding it can quietly cut your reach and remove valuable prospects—especially on placements or sites that don’t support (or don’t pass) demographic targeting signals. Unless you have a very specific reason to narrow reach aggressively, keeping “Unknown” enabled is usually the right call.
When the account is still learning. In smaller accounts or new campaigns, demographic performance is noisy. Exclusions too early can lock you into a narrow pocket of demand and prevent the system from finding efficient conversions you didn’t anticipate.
When automation needs room to optimize. If you’re using automated bidding (especially conversion-based strategies), heavy demographic exclusions can reduce the volume needed for stable learning and can increase volatility. Often, the better approach is to keep broad eligibility and tighten intent using keywords, search terms, creatives, landing pages, and qualification steps.
A practical framework to decide what to exclude (step by step)
Step 1: Diagnose with the Demographics report (before touching targeting)
Before you exclude anything, pull demographic performance for a clean date range (at least 30 days; ideally 60–90 if volume allows). Then sanity-check whether you’re looking at enough conversions per segment to make a decision. If a segment only has a handful of conversions, your “CPA by age” story is usually just randomness.
Also check whether your conversion action is a true success event. If you optimize to a low-intent conversion (like “page view” or “time on site”), demographic optimization becomes misleading fast, because different groups browse differently.
Step 2: Fix measurement and lead-quality feedback loops first
If you can’t distinguish a qualified lead from an unqualified lead, demographic exclusions become guesswork. The most profitable accounts I’ve managed treat demographics as one of many signals—but the signal only becomes actionable when you can connect conversions to quality (offline imports, enhanced conversion setup where applicable, or at least a strong lead scoring/qualification process).
Step 3: Run controlled tests before permanent exclusions
When you suspect a segment is weak, testing is safer than immediately excluding. Depending on campaign type and bidding, that may look like reducing bid adjustments (where available) or splitting budget into a test campaign that applies demographic restrictions while the original stays open. Your goal is to confirm you’re improving incremental performance, not just shifting volume around.
Step 4: Apply exclusions only when you can answer “what happens to the money?”
The hidden risk with exclusions is not the exclusion—it’s the reallocation. If you exclude a segment, where will that spend go? Into stronger demographics? Into weaker placements? Into broader match variants? This is why exclusions should be paired with a clear plan to redirect spend toward proven intent signals (high-performing search themes, better-qualified audiences, stronger geos, or more specific landing pages).
Quick decision checklist (use this before excluding any demographic)
- Is the segment large enough that performance is statistically meaningful (not just a few clicks or a couple conversions)?
- Is the conversion action you’re optimizing to a true business outcome (or at least strongly correlated with it)?
- Does the segment remain weak across multiple time windows (not just a recent dip)?
- Have you checked whether “Unknown” is a major share of conversions/revenue?
- Do you have a clear plan for where the freed budget should go (and how you’ll verify it improved results)?
Policy and platform constraints you must consider (especially in the U.S.)
Housing, employment, and credit: demographic targeting restrictions
If you advertise in housing, employment, or credit-related categories in the United States (and certain other regions), you may not be allowed to use certain demographic targeting controls the way advertisers typically do. In these restricted categories, demographic targeting and bid adjustments can be limited or prohibited, and the platform may require you to keep demographic categories enabled rather than excluding them. If you operate in any of these verticals (or adjacent services that can be interpreted as such), treat demographic exclusions as a compliance risk until you confirm the exact restriction set for your ads and targeting configuration.
Minors and age targeting: what you can and can’t do
Users under 18 aren’t eligible for personalized advertising. This matters for two reasons. First, you generally shouldn’t build strategies that assume you can “target minors” using demographic selections. Second, if you think you’re seeing results from ages 14–17, what’s often happening in practice is that the traffic is being attributed to “Unknown” age rather than a confirmed under-18 bucket.
Separately, for signed-in child accounts managed under family supervision (under 13 or the applicable age in the country), advertisers can request an additional exclusion so ads don’t show to those recognized users across major networks. That’s not the same as demographic targeting; it’s an account-level exclusion request designed for child accounts.
The “Unknown” category is not “low quality”—it’s “not identified”
“Unknown” doesn’t mean “not your customer.” It means the platform can’t confidently infer the user’s age, gender, parental status, or household income. Many excellent customers sit in “Unknown,” and some inventory sources don’t support demographic signals at all. Excluding “Unknown” is one of the fastest ways to accidentally shrink scale and raise costs—so do it only when you’re intentionally narrowing reach and you’ve proven the tradeoff is worth it.
How I handle demographic exclusions in real accounts
Search campaigns: prioritize intent first, demographics second
On Search, query intent (keywords and search terms) usually dominates demographics. If performance is weak in a demographic segment, I first look for an intent mismatch: overly broad queries, poor landing page alignment, or a funnel that doesn’t qualify users well. Only after intent is tight do I consider demographic bid adjustments or exclusions—and even then, I avoid excluding “Unknown” unless the account is mature and the business is intentionally narrowing.
Display, video, and Demand Gen: demographics can help, but exclusions should be tested
In upper-funnel campaigns, demographic exclusions can change the entire audience composition quickly. That can be good when you’re aligning creative to a very specific buyer, but it can also strip away low-cost reach that later converts through remarketing or assisted paths. Here, I’m more likely to run parallel tests: one ad group/campaign open, one restricted, both measured against the same conversion definitions and (ideally) downstream quality metrics.
If you’re unsure, don’t exclude—segment and learn
If you’re on the fence, the safest “expert move” is to leave demographics enabled, keep “Unknown” included, and use reporting to learn where the best performance truly comes from. Then apply measured changes—small bid shifts, creative variants by audience, or budget splits—before you make permanent exclusions that you’ll later have to unwind.
