How Many Responsive Search Ads Can You Use in Google Ads?

Alexandre Airvault
January 19, 2026

The hard limit: how many Responsive Search Ads you can use

In Google Ads, the limit is 3 enabled Responsive Search Ads (RSAs) per ad group. That’s the number that matters operationally, because only enabled ads can enter the auction and serve.

You can typically keep additional RSAs in the same ad group if they’re paused (for example, to preserve historical creative or hold seasonal variants), but you can’t have more than three in enabled status at the same time within a single ad group.

Zooming out, there are also broader “container” limits that can come into play in unusual setups, like the maximum number of active text/non-image ads allowed within an ad group and total ads allowed in an account. Most advertisers never hit those account-wide ceilings, but the 3 enabled RSAs per ad group is a day-to-day constraint you’ll run into immediately once you start building properly structured Search campaigns.

Enabled vs. paused vs. removed (why this matters)

If you’ve ever thought, “Google Ads won’t let me add another RSA,” it’s almost always because you already have three RSAs set to enabled in that ad group. The fix is simple: pause one of the enabled RSAs (or create the new RSA as paused), then enable the combination you actually want live.

From a performance-management standpoint, pausing instead of removing is usually the better move. Removing permanently discards the ad from your working set, while pausing keeps it available for future testing, seasonality, or compliance re-checks—without breaking your “three enabled” rule.

Best practice: how many RSAs you should run to maximize performance

Even though you can enable up to three RSAs per ad group, you don’t automatically should. In most accounts I manage, the sweet spot is 1 strong RSA per ad group as the foundation, with a second (and occasionally third) used only when there’s a clear testing or messaging purpose.

Why? RSAs already contain a lot of built-in variation. Each RSA can include up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions, and the system assembles combinations dynamically. If you run three RSAs that all say roughly the same thing, you often dilute learning, split impressions, and slow down optimization without getting meaningfully better coverage.

When a second RSA is genuinely worth it

I’ll typically add a second enabled RSA when there’s a distinct “angle” that deserves its own full asset set. For example, one RSA might lean into price/offer, while another leans into speed, availability, or premium quality—still within the same tightly themed ad group and landing page experience. This is also useful when you need separate messaging for different audience intents that still map to the same keyword cluster.

A second RSA can also be justified when you have materially different creative requirements, such as regulated disclaimers, strict brand language, or must-show statements where pinning and compliance create a “constraint-heavy” RSA. In those cases, a second RSA can let you keep one ad more flexible (for stronger overall combinations) while maintaining a compliant variant that serves appropriately.

When a third RSA makes sense (rare, but real)

A third enabled RSA is best reserved for controlled experiments with a clear hypothesis (for example, a new positioning statement, a new primary call-to-action, or a seasonal message). If you can’t clearly explain what the third RSA is testing—and what success looks like—it usually becomes clutter.

As a rule of thumb: if your ad group volume is low to moderate, a third RSA often just spreads impressions too thin. If your volume is high, you have enough traffic to test a third RSA without starving the others.

How to make fewer RSAs outperform more RSAs (a practical build approach)

The highest-performing RSA setups aren’t the ones with the most ads—they’re the ones where each RSA is built to give the system high-quality, non-repetitive inputs. Your goal is to create a single RSA that can cover multiple user motivations without becoming generic.

Build one “core” RSA the right way

Start by aiming for a single RSA with a strong range of unique headlines and descriptions. Avoid repeating the same idea with minor wording changes. You want genuinely different value props, benefits, qualifiers, and calls-to-action so the system has real choices to assemble.

Be cautious with pinning. Pinning can be helpful when specific text must appear in a specific position, but heavy pinning reduces combination flexibility. When advertisers complain RSAs “don’t test,” pinning is often the reason—too many assets are locked into place, so the system can’t explore better-performing combinations.

Also make sure your assets can stand alone. Headlines and descriptions can appear in different orders, so each line should read cleanly without relying on the line before it to make sense.

A simple, repeatable workflow (use this before you add RSA #2 or #3)

  • Step 1: Enable 1 RSA per ad group and build it with a full, diverse asset set (up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions where possible), keeping repetition low.
  • Step 2: Let performance stabilize long enough to learn something meaningful (this depends on volume, but don’t judge after a handful of clicks).
  • Step 3: If you need to test a different angle, enable RSA #2 with intentionally different messaging (not a near-duplicate).
  • Step 4: Only enable RSA #3 if you have the volume and a clear hypothesis; otherwise, keep additional ideas as paused drafts until you’re ready to test.

Common reasons Google Ads “won’t let you add” another RSA

If you hit an error or the UI blocks you, it’s usually one of these scenarios: you already have three RSAs enabled in that ad group; you’ve hit an ad-group-level cap for active text/non-image ads; or you’re attempting to enable something that’s still under review or limited by policy enforcement. In most normal cases, pausing one enabled RSA immediately resolves the limit issue.

Let AI handle
the Google Ads grunt work

Try our AI Agents now
Topic Key takeaway Recommended action Relevant limits & rules Helpful Google Ads docs
Hard limit: how many RSAs per ad group You can have a maximum of 3 enabled Responsive Search Ads (RSAs) per ad group. Paused RSAs don’t count toward this enabled limit and can be kept for history, seasonality, or future testing. Use up to 3 enabled RSAs only when you have clear testing plans. Keep extra concepts as paused RSAs so you don’t lose historical creative while respecting the 3‑enabled limit. Google’s responsive search ads format allows multiple text assets in a single ad; ad‑group and account containers also have overall ad limits, but you’ll usually hit the “3 enabled RSAs” constraint first in day‑to‑day work. About responsive search ads
Google Ads specs: ad formats, sizes, and best practices
Enabled vs. paused vs. removed If Google Ads “won’t let you add another RSA,” it’s usually because you already have 3 enabled RSAs in that ad group. Pausing an ad frees up a slot; removing it deletes it from your working set but doesn’t change the fact that only enabled ads can serve. When you need to create a new RSA and you’re at the limit, pause one of the enabled RSAs or create the new ad as paused, then enable the mix you want live. Prefer pausing over removing so you keep creatives for future use and compliance checks. Only ads with an active/eligible status (for example, “Enabled” or “Eligible”) can enter the auction. Paused, ended, removed, or under‑review ads will not serve until their status changes. Find your ad status
Set up your ads for success
Best‑practice number of RSAs per ad group Even though you can enable 3 RSAs, most ad groups perform best with 1 strong RSA as the foundation, and a second only when there’s a specific, distinct testing angle. A third RSA should be rare and hypothesis‑driven. Default to 1 RSA per ad group with excellent ad strength and diverse assets. Add a second RSA only when you’re testing a clearly different message or constraint pattern (for example, strict legal copy vs. flexible copy). Each RSA can have up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions, so one well‑built ad already covers a lot of variation. More RSAs with similar messaging often just split impressions and slow learning. About Ad Strength for responsive search ads
About responsive search ads
When a second RSA is worth it A second enabled RSA makes sense when you have a distinct angle (for example, price/offer focus vs. speed/quality focus) or materially different requirements (such as regulatory disclaimers, strict brand language, or must‑show statements that require pinning). Use RSA #2 to:
– Test a clearly different value proposition or audience intent within the same tightly themed ad group.
– Separate a constraint‑heavy, pinned/compliance RSA from a more flexible, performance‑oriented RSA.
RSAs dynamically assemble combinations from your assets based on predicted performance, so having two truly different sets of assets can help Google match messaging to different queries or user intents. Set up your ads for success
Responsive search ads campaign-level text assets
When a third RSA makes sense A third enabled RSA should be rare and used only for structured experiments (for example, new positioning, new primary CTA, or seasonal messaging). Without a clear hypothesis, a third RSA usually just adds clutter. Only enable RSA #3 if:
– Your ad group has high volume so each RSA can still gather statistically useful data.
– You can clearly define what you’re testing and what success looks like. Otherwise, keep additional ideas paused as drafts.
Low‑to‑moderate volume ad groups tend to spread impressions too thin across 3 RSAs, slowing optimization. High‑volume groups can support 3‑way testing without starving other ads. About responsive search ads
About Ad Strength for responsive search ads
Building one “core” RSA the right way The best‑performing setups rely on fewer, higher‑quality RSAs. Each RSA should contain a strong range of unique headlines and descriptions that represent genuinely different value propositions, benefits, qualifiers, and CTAs—without repetitive phrasing. For your core RSA:
– Use as many unique headlines (up to 15) and descriptions (up to 4) as make sense.
– Avoid near‑duplicates and minor wording tweaks.
– Make each line able to stand alone, since headlines and descriptions can show in different orders and combinations.
Ad strength and Google’s asset guidance reward ads with many unique, relevant assets. Limiting repetition expands the number of viable asset combinations the system can test and optimize toward. About Ad Strength for responsive search ads
Set up your ads for success
Pinning and combination flexibility Pinning headlines or descriptions to fixed positions is useful for compliance or must‑show statements, but heavy pinning reduces combination flexibility and can make it feel like RSAs “don’t test.” Only pin when necessary (for example, legal or regulatory text), and keep most assets unpinned so Google can freely test combinations. If pinning is unavoidable, consider a separate, more flexible RSA to preserve performance. Ad strength guidance explicitly warns that heavy pinning lowers the number of combinations available, which can reduce performance and learning speed. About Ad Strength for responsive search ads
About responsive search ads
Practical workflow before adding RSA #2 or #3 The blog recommends a simple, repeatable flow: start with one robust RSA, let it collect enough data, then layer in additional RSAs only for deliberate tests. Step 1: Enable 1 RSA per ad group with up to 15 unique headlines and 4 descriptions.
Step 2: Let performance stabilize; avoid judging after just a few clicks.
Step 3: If you need a new angle, enable RSA #2 with intentionally different messaging.
Step 4: Only enable RSA #3 if you have sufficient volume and a clear hypothesis; otherwise keep extra ideas paused.
This approach aligns with Google’s recommendation to have at least one RSA with “Good” or “Excellent” ad strength per ad group, then refine based on performance insights rather than over‑loading each ad group with many similar ads. About Ad Strength for responsive search ads
Set up your ads for success
Common reasons you can’t add another RSA Errors in the UI like “can’t create another ad” typically stem from already having 3 enabled RSAs, hitting an ad‑group‑level cap for active text ads, or trying to enable an ad that’s still under review or limited by policy. First, check how many RSAs in the ad group are enabled and pause one if you’re at three. If that’s not it, review the ad’s status and policy details to confirm whether it’s under review, limited, or disapproved before troubleshooting further. Only ads with eligible statuses can run. Under‑review or disapproved ads won’t serve until they pass policy checks, and paused or removed campaigns/ad groups can prevent ads from serving even if the individual ad itself looks enabled. Find your ad status
Support for ads under review

Let AI handle
the Google Ads grunt work

Try our AI Agents now

If you’re working within Google Ads’ limits (like the maximum of 3 enabled Responsive Search Ads per ad group) and trying to keep testing disciplined—usually starting with one strong RSA, adding a second only for a distinct angle, and keeping extra concepts paused—it helps to have a workflow that consistently checks what’s live, what’s learning, and what’s worth iterating on. Blobr connects to your Google Ads account and continuously analyzes performance so best practices like focused RSA testing, asset quality, and intent-to-landing-page alignment turn into clear, prioritized actions; and if you want extra help on execution, its specialized agents (such as a Headlines Enhancer for improving RSA assets and a Best URL Landing Matcher for tightening landing page relevance) can suggest concrete changes while you stay in control.

The hard limit: how many Responsive Search Ads you can use

In Google Ads, the limit is 3 enabled Responsive Search Ads (RSAs) per ad group. That’s the number that matters operationally, because only enabled ads can enter the auction and serve.

You can typically keep additional RSAs in the same ad group if they’re paused (for example, to preserve historical creative or hold seasonal variants), but you can’t have more than three in enabled status at the same time within a single ad group.

Zooming out, there are also broader “container” limits that can come into play in unusual setups, like the maximum number of active text/non-image ads allowed within an ad group and total ads allowed in an account. Most advertisers never hit those account-wide ceilings, but the 3 enabled RSAs per ad group is a day-to-day constraint you’ll run into immediately once you start building properly structured Search campaigns.

Enabled vs. paused vs. removed (why this matters)

If you’ve ever thought, “Google Ads won’t let me add another RSA,” it’s almost always because you already have three RSAs set to enabled in that ad group. The fix is simple: pause one of the enabled RSAs (or create the new RSA as paused), then enable the combination you actually want live.

From a performance-management standpoint, pausing instead of removing is usually the better move. Removing permanently discards the ad from your working set, while pausing keeps it available for future testing, seasonality, or compliance re-checks—without breaking your “three enabled” rule.

Best practice: how many RSAs you should run to maximize performance

Even though you can enable up to three RSAs per ad group, you don’t automatically should. In most accounts I manage, the sweet spot is 1 strong RSA per ad group as the foundation, with a second (and occasionally third) used only when there’s a clear testing or messaging purpose.

Why? RSAs already contain a lot of built-in variation. Each RSA can include up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions, and the system assembles combinations dynamically. If you run three RSAs that all say roughly the same thing, you often dilute learning, split impressions, and slow down optimization without getting meaningfully better coverage.

When a second RSA is genuinely worth it

I’ll typically add a second enabled RSA when there’s a distinct “angle” that deserves its own full asset set. For example, one RSA might lean into price/offer, while another leans into speed, availability, or premium quality—still within the same tightly themed ad group and landing page experience. This is also useful when you need separate messaging for different audience intents that still map to the same keyword cluster.

A second RSA can also be justified when you have materially different creative requirements, such as regulated disclaimers, strict brand language, or must-show statements where pinning and compliance create a “constraint-heavy” RSA. In those cases, a second RSA can let you keep one ad more flexible (for stronger overall combinations) while maintaining a compliant variant that serves appropriately.

When a third RSA makes sense (rare, but real)

A third enabled RSA is best reserved for controlled experiments with a clear hypothesis (for example, a new positioning statement, a new primary call-to-action, or a seasonal message). If you can’t clearly explain what the third RSA is testing—and what success looks like—it usually becomes clutter.

As a rule of thumb: if your ad group volume is low to moderate, a third RSA often just spreads impressions too thin. If your volume is high, you have enough traffic to test a third RSA without starving the others.

How to make fewer RSAs outperform more RSAs (a practical build approach)

The highest-performing RSA setups aren’t the ones with the most ads—they’re the ones where each RSA is built to give the system high-quality, non-repetitive inputs. Your goal is to create a single RSA that can cover multiple user motivations without becoming generic.

Build one “core” RSA the right way

Start by aiming for a single RSA with a strong range of unique headlines and descriptions. Avoid repeating the same idea with minor wording changes. You want genuinely different value props, benefits, qualifiers, and calls-to-action so the system has real choices to assemble.

Be cautious with pinning. Pinning can be helpful when specific text must appear in a specific position, but heavy pinning reduces combination flexibility. When advertisers complain RSAs “don’t test,” pinning is often the reason—too many assets are locked into place, so the system can’t explore better-performing combinations.

Also make sure your assets can stand alone. Headlines and descriptions can appear in different orders, so each line should read cleanly without relying on the line before it to make sense.

A simple, repeatable workflow (use this before you add RSA #2 or #3)

  • Step 1: Enable 1 RSA per ad group and build it with a full, diverse asset set (up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions where possible), keeping repetition low.
  • Step 2: Let performance stabilize long enough to learn something meaningful (this depends on volume, but don’t judge after a handful of clicks).
  • Step 3: If you need to test a different angle, enable RSA #2 with intentionally different messaging (not a near-duplicate).
  • Step 4: Only enable RSA #3 if you have the volume and a clear hypothesis; otherwise, keep additional ideas as paused drafts until you’re ready to test.

Common reasons Google Ads “won’t let you add” another RSA

If you hit an error or the UI blocks you, it’s usually one of these scenarios: you already have three RSAs enabled in that ad group; you’ve hit an ad-group-level cap for active text/non-image ads; or you’re attempting to enable something that’s still under review or limited by policy enforcement. In most normal cases, pausing one enabled RSA immediately resolves the limit issue.